Skip Ribbon Commands Skip to main content
Most Visited Pages
Article Archives
Contact us
Jobs
Reader Survey
Join the Reader Panel
Subscribe
Advertise
NSC HOME > Safety+Health
Share
I2P2: Already mandated
Kyle W. Morrison
 

The argument about whether the government can require employers to have an injury and illness prevention program is moot in nearly a third of the country.

During a recent presentation at a safety and health summit in Omaha, NE, OSHA administrator David Michaels noted that 15 states mandate some form of a prevention program. (See map below.)

Considering the thousands of employers who are already required to have an injury and illness prevention program, and the thousands more who do so voluntarily, perhaps stakeholders and interest groups should work with OSHA on how to best draft and implement such a requirement on a national level instead of debating the regulation’s merits.

After all, if populous states such as California and New York – which combined make up nearly a fifth of the total U.S. labor force – and bastions of conservatism such as Arizona and Louisiana deem it necessary to have an I2P2 rule on the books, it’s probably a good idea for the rest of the country.

 

States that mandate some form of injury and illness prevention program

Source: OSHA


The opinions expressed in "Washington Wire" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

 
Comment
 
  Type the characters you see in the picture
 
  Letters are not case-sensitive
 


Comments
Commented on 6/26/2012 2:28:05 PM
I work in Construction Safety in Missouri and have no idea to what this article might refer for our state. I assume that means someone has streeeetched the definition of an I2P2. How many others are similar streeetches.
 
Retrieving Data
 
NSC Home | NSC Membership | NSC Safety @ work | NSC Congress & Expo | NSC Publications