Skip Ribbon Commands Skip to main content
Most Visited Pages
Article Archives
Contact us
Jobs
Reader Survey
Join the Reader Panel
Subscribe
Advertise
NSC HOME > Safety+Health
Share
OSHA Roundup for Feb. 25, 2013
Kyle W. Morrison, Senior Associate Editor
 

Review counter

Below is a count of how many days recent OSHA proposals have been under review, as of today:

# of Days
742 Silica (proposed rule)
461 Modernizing OSHA’s reporting system for injuries and illnesses (proposed rule)
243 Electric power transmission and distribution; electrical protective equipment (final rule)

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – part of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget – reviews proposed regulations. The process is required for most rules before they can move forward, and typically takes 90 days.

News

A new bill proposes codifying the Voluntary Protection Programs.

OSHA would be forced to issue an interim Combustible Dust Standard under proposed House legislation.

Notable proposed fines

$119,840 to a total of three companies in connection with the flash fire deaths of two workers at a Texas worksite

$112,500 to a Texas die cast manufacturer for allegations of exposing workers to electrical and fall hazards (.pdf file), and violations (.pdf file) of the Hazard Communication Standard

$91,000 to a contractor following a worker’s forklift-related injury at a Chicago exhibition hall

The opinions expressed in "Washington Wire" do not necessarily reflect those of the National Safety Council or affiliated local Chapters.

 
Comment
 
  Type the characters you see in the picture
 
  Letters are not case-sensitive
 


Comments
Commented on 3/26/2013 4:33:39 AM
It\'s a myth that OSHA protects the stefay of the worker. OSHA\'s mandate is simply to make the job safer than it would be without OSHA. Cost/benefit analyses are performed on new proposed stefay regulations, and if the cost is determined to exceed the benefit, the proposed safeguards are not put into place. Additionally, when any new regulation is proposed, public comments are legally solicited and published in the Federal Register. These comments ultimately determine if the regulation is promulgated.It is really a double-edged sword. We can make the jobs safer by spending more money, but we have to pass the cost along to the customer or lower the profits of the business. Yes, that could cause businesses that comply to go bankrupt while those who ignore the regulations thrive. If you don’t believe that, look up coal mining stefay records and profits.Is the cost worth it? I guess it depends on if the life or limb that is missing because the stefay costs were too high belong to friend or foe. How much money would you spend to save your son\'s or daughter\'s eyes, arms, legs, or life? I am happy to see that technology is solving some of the worker stefay problems!
 
 
NSC Home | NSC Membership | NSC Safety @ work | NSC Congress & Expo | NSC Publications